EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-10/000882_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Oct 16 03:53:19 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-11-07 | 2KB

Received: by mail.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA259340799; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 03:53:19 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from mail.infinet.com by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA259280795; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 03:53:15 -0700
Received: by mail.infinet.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #9)
    id m0t4mzK-000K9VC; Mon, 16 Oct 95 06:41 EDT
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 06:41:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: "J. David Johnson" <[e-mail]>
X-Sender: jdavid@rigel
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: AC, Joe, and Manny: Thanks RE: Rendering
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/[e-mail]>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951016064009.17349B-100000@rigel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 15 Oct 1995, Robert Cohen wrote:

> I remember hearing that in one of the Stranahan tapes also, but the fact
> of the matter is, whenever I use field rendering, I experience nearly
> twice the rendering time.  So... my question is, how do you employ field
> rendering without adding substantially to the rendering times ??
>

Simple.  Just render out your anim at step 2... ;)

J. David - Video GT

--
"J. David Johnson" <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]